Subject: Re: options magick or imagemagick?
To: Klaus Heinz <k.heinz@oktsieben.kh-22.de>
From: OBATA Akio <obata@lins.jp>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 10/16/2007 09:44:00
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:57:35 +0900, Klaus Heinz <k.heinz@oktsieben.kh-22.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> mk/defaults/options.description contains
>
> bugzilla-imagemagick Compress .BMPs to save space.
> graphicsmagick Use GraphicsMagick as imaging library.
> imagemagick Use ImageMagick as imaging library.
> magick
>
> As far as I could determine "imagemagick" is used by graphics/ruby-RMagick
> and multimedia/transcode while "magick" is used only by graphics/zphoto.
>
> I propose to remove "magick" and change the option for graphics/zphoto
> to "imagemagick".
>
> Any other package affected by this?
RMagick/zphoto/GraphicsMagick is mine :-)
I'm okay to rename "magick" optfion for zphoto.
I added "magick" option for zphoto, since zphoto's configure option name is "magick".
Then I added "imagemagick" and "graphicsmagick" option for RMagick, since RMagick supports
both ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick and I added GraphicsMagick for RMagick.
(but graphicsmagick option will be removed because RMagick 2.0 will not support GraphicsMagick:-<
ImageMagick is sucks!)
--
"Of course I love NetBSD":-)
OBATA Akio / obata@lins.jp