Haai,

On Mon, October 29, 2007 08:05, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 06:16:05PM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote:
>> On 2007-10-28 18:12:00 (+0100), Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>[snip]
>
> Anyway, I think he's being unreasonable.  Even if I had committed this
> update
> "on time", a next one would have been too late.  The guy just seems to
> have a
> problem with packagers in general.

Does having a problem with 'packagers in general' -- one that I personally
share, although I'll be the first to acknowledge the necessity of package
systems -- make a person unreasonable?

>  He has even threatened with legal
> action
> against some[*].  That's not someone I want to deal with, and others here
> have
> expressed similar opinions.

You're only confirming the validity of his point here by taking offence
from a simple request which should have been anticipated while reading the
license. You quote some random bitch fight on the issue, but
(conveniently?) forget that a simple rename would have been enough to
statisfy his requirements, /as stated in the conversation you quoted/.

Baai,

De Zeurkous
-----------

Friggin' Machines!

>
> 	Geert
>
> [*] http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/tur-users/2007-April/004634.html