Martti Kuparinen wrote:

>> And, secondly, why is it GNU-GPL-v[23], the "GNU-" bit is
>> unnecessary. Or maybe we should call the BSD ones
> 
> I'd call it "GPL-v[23]" (and LGPL-v[23]).

I can even add these, just say "go" and I'll add these...

ftp -o GPL-v2 ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/Licenses/COPYING-2.0
ftp -o GPL-v3 ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/Licenses/COPYING-3.0
ftp -o LGPL-v2 ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/Licenses/COPYING.LIB-2.0
ftp -o LGPL-v3 ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/Licenses/COPYING.LIB-3.0

/usr/pkgsrc/licenses> cvs update
? GPL-v2
? GPL-v3
? LGPL-v2
? LGPL-v3

Martti