On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Matthias Scheler wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:58:23AM -0600, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > Do you need this x11/xcursor? Does your native X already provide a better 
> > libXcursor?
> 
> I think so. But I don't think that "pkgsrc" detects that.

What package are you trying to build that pulled in xcursor? We may need 
to fix its dependency to not use x11/xcursor but (if applicable) to use 
x11/libXcursor/buildlink3.mk instead.

(Note the x11/libXcursor/buildlink3.mk will use x11-links if not 
"modular".)

As for detecting, that is done with builtin.mk file, but I was assuming 
that old xcursor wasn't used by anything.

> Mac OS X Leopard provides an X11 which is very similar to the one 
> provided by our modular X.org solution. But e.g. "x11-links" seems to 
> ignore a lot of the ".pc" files.

I worked at updating them (but looks like I last committed to them long 
ago). Can you provide a list of files under your X that are not also 
listed in the pkgtools/x11-links/files/xorg.* ??