Re: Depending on a package with an option?

[matthew sporleder <msporleder%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu%netbsd.org@localhost> 
wrote:
> Quentin Garnier <cube%cubidou.net@localhost> wrote:
>
>> You also have the option to create a package openldap-server-dso that
>> would only provide that bit, and depend on it.  You still haven't said
>> what that dso option was :-)
>
> Support for loading modules
>
>> I'm with Joerg on that one, if it's not a big deal, making that dso
>> option the default could be the easiest path, and you'd leave to some
>> other poor slob the issue of depending on options.
>
> I would do it if I was sure that openldap-server was as stable with dso
> than without. I really don't know.
>

I'm pretty sure symas's openldap is dso, so I think it's as safe as it gets.