Re: design of SUBST_STAGE=post-install behavior?

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 04:13:55PM -0600, Brook Milligan wrote:
> I am unclear on the intended design of the substitution mechanism when
> invoked at the post-install stage.

Using substs in the post-install phase sounds wrong. What is using that?

> As currently implemented, mk/subst.mk creates cookie files of the form
> .subst_${_class_}_done, which are only deleted when the work directory
> is deleted.

Try make reinstall.

Joerg