Re: git copies of cvs modules available

[Michal Suchanek <hramrach%centrum.cz@localhost>]

2009/11/6 Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar%gmail.com@localhost>:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon 
> <tls%panix.com@localhost> wrote:
>> I am starting to think the FreeBSD team were pretty perceptive to go with
>> svn, as, perhaps, the least-worst available option...
>>
> This doesn't change the conversion problem, which will have to be
> handled anyway. I will not comment further on SVN as I think is even
> worse than CVS.
>
> Wrt the conversion issue, I am more a fan of keithp's parsecvs way
> rather parsing cvs output. However, this way is a bit more painful and
> parsecvs doesn't work porperly with our ,v files (some of them are
> corrupted anyway).
>

Perhaps NetBSD should stick to CVS because no conversion tool can
handle its corrupt repository ;-)

Thanks

Michal