Re: mailman and binary paths

[Filip Hajny <filip%joyent.com@localhost>]

On 7.12.2009, at 22:51, Hauke Fath wrote:

> Hm - any reason not to go through mailwrapper(8), so that people using
> other MTAs are covered, too?
> 

This is not a question of MTAs here. The ways how to use Mailman with different 
MTAs are documented on their site, and the two Postfix-related config values 
mentioned here only apply if you pick Postfix *and* want to go the "add each 
list to Postfix aliases" approach (of the three existing ways).

--
Filip Hajny
Joyent Inc.