Re: PAM problem with netatalk package

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On May 3,  9:37pm, mark%ecs.vuw.ac.nz@localhost (Mark Davies) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: PAM problem with netatalk package

| On Monday 03 May 2010 16:23:31 Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > | So is this happening because pam_nologin.so.1 is being dynamically
| > | loaded in libpam which (in afpd's case) is itself in a module that is
| > | dynamically loaded into the afpd process
| > | (/usr/pkg/libexec/netatalk/uams/uams_pam.so)?
| > |
| > | If so how do you get that to work?
| > 
| > Add -lpam as a dependency in all the rest of the pam modules? Don't do
| > RTLD_NOW, but RTLD_LAZY? The first one should definitely work I think.
| 
| The first did work - adding the following patch got things working:
| 
| RCS file: /src/cvs/netbsd/src/lib/libpam/modules/mod.mk,v
| retrieving revision 1.6
| diff -r1.6 mod.mk
| 6a7,8
| > LIBDPLIBS+=   pam     ${.CURDIR}/../../libpam
| >
| 
| 
| But then thinking about things and attacking it from the netatalk end, this 
| patch to netatalk also works:
| 
| --- include/atalk/util.h.orig   2010-05-03 09:28:16.000000000 +0000
| +++ include/atalk/util.h
| @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ extern void mod_close    __P((void *));
|   * OpenBSD currently does not use the second arg for dlopen(). For
|   * future compatibility we define DL_LAZY */
|  #ifdef __NetBSD__
| -#define mod_open(a)      dlopen(a, RTLD_LAZY)
| +#define mod_open(a)      dlopen(a, RTLD_LAZY|RTLD_GLOBAL)
|  #elif defined(__OpenBSD__)
|  #define mod_open(a)      dlopen(a, DL_LAZY)
|  #else /* ! __NetBSD__ && ! __OpenBSD__ */
| 
| 
| So I can fix the immediate problem with the netatalk patch but not sure if 
| the pam change should be applied and pulled up to 5.* (and 4.*?) anyway.

I think that the patch should be applied to both 5.* and 4.*.

Thans for testing!

christos