Re: clang support

To: tech-pkg%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: clang support
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 14:17:01 +0100

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 01:59:50PM +0100, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> > Also fortran enabled via f2c, as other compilers do.
> Ah, brilliant. This seems to fix the problem that libtool refuses to build 
> shared C libraries.
> (I nevertheless think that libtool is broken. Generation of shared C 
> libraries should not depend on the availability to certain Plankalkül 
> compiler.)

The problem is that a lot of packages request Fortran support from
libtool without actually needing that. That costs both time and can
result in exactly that issue...

Joerg

References:
- [HEADS-UP] Freeze in Preparation for pkgsrc-2010Q4 Branch
  - From: Alistair Crooks
- clang support (was: [HEADS-UP] Freeze in Preparation for pkgsrc-2010Q4 Branch)
  - From: Edgar Fuß
- Re: clang support (was: [HEADS-UP] Freeze in Preparation for pkgsrc-2010Q4 Branch)
  - From: Adam
- Re: clang support
  - From: Edgar Fuß

Prev by Date: Re: clang support (was: [HEADS-UP] Freeze in Preparation for pkgsrc-2010Q4 Branch)
Next by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Previous by Thread: Re: clang support
Next by Thread: Re: clang support (was: [HEADS-UP] Freeze in Preparation for pkgsrc-2010Q4 Branch)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index