Re: Broken binaries again

[Bernd Ernesti <netbsd%lists.veego.de@localhost>]

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:30:45PM +0300, Aleksey Cheusov wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
> <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:03:19PM +0300, Aleksey Cheusov wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
> >> <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> >> > Let's try the easiest. "It doesn't fix anything"
> >>
> >> I still don't see any rational. If you don't demonstrate anything
> >> except this I'll consider nobody objects.
> >
> > It's a perfectly clear rational. You don't fix the problem, just some of
> > the symptoms.
> 
> Fixing the symptoms in our case allows to install those packages using
> nih and pkgin

Then nih and pkgin needs to be fixed to cope with this issue.

Adding a hack to disallow to execute the checks is not good
and should not be done.

Bernd