Re: New options for freeswitch

[David Laight <david%l8s.co.uk@localhost>]

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:30:51PM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:17:57 +0100
> David Laight <david%l8s.co.uk@localhost> wrote:
> > Which all means that you want separate packages, probably -16k -32k
> > and -48k. Even the unadourned one with the 8k music is probably
> > optional.
> 
> OK, so four music packages, four sound packages (although the choice
> for one will probably be the same as for the other) plus the base
> package and the meta package which will probably still need these
> options to choose which sound and music packages to pull in.  Does it
> really make sense to create ten packages instead of four and still need
> the options?

I presume the 'meta' package is there to pull in a working set of pacakges?
I suspect it need not contain the 'high quality' sound parts, as they
can be installed as extras - would make sense to me.

Maybe put all the high quality sound bits in one gigantic package??

        David

-- 
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost