Re: Why adding unconditional dependency on tradcpp? (Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/net/tightvnc)

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 11:17:58AM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 22:56:10 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger 
> <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:32:53PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> >>On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 21:15:36 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger 
> >><joerg%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Log Message:
> >>>Always use tradcpp. Fix prototypes. Bump revision.
> >>
> >>You are doing such changes (Always use tradcpp) for not a little packages,
> >>whereas I have ever no problem before.
> >>
> >>Then, why not do it as conditionally (for broken situation for you)?
> >
> >I strongly prefer to get consistent behavior. Given that this is imake
> >we are talking about, any improvement on that front is worth the minimal
> >price.
> 
> "we"? you and who?
> 
> I cannot find `imake' in x11/libX11, x11/libXext, x11/libXt,....?

devel/imake. Note that I already killed using native imake for exactly
the same reason.

Joerg