Re: MESSAGE issue (Re: licenses/arrl-license (Re: ham/trustedQSL)

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:40:40PM +0900, Makoto Fujiwara wrote:
> (1) If we omit the MESSAGE for the license, it apparently
> implies replacing there LICENSE.txt by our licenses/modified-bsd.

No, I just mean "include the LICENSE.txt file, but don't show it in the
MESSAGE". That's enough to cover the binary redistribution clause.

That's pretty much independent of whether LICENSE=modified-bsd or
LICENSE=arrl-license or whatever is used.

I just don't believe the license is important enough to be shown during
installation. Post-installation instructions are a completely different
deal.

Joerg