"Sevan / Venture37" <venture37%gmail.com@localhost> writes: > I would say before we import libressl into pkgsrc, we should address > all the packages which are currently broken by LibreSSL. The bulkbuild > on OpenBSD/amd64 gives us a clear picture of what needs fixing and > luckily in most of the major cases (Python & Apache) fixes have been > applied upstream. > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-bulk/2015/04/06/msg011484.html Certainly it sounds like fixing upstream packages is good progress, but why do you think that needs to be ordered with making libressl available under a subprefix? > I'd personally like to see a complete switch to LibreSSL however it is > not currently possible due to do that with all the operating systems > we support in pkgsrc e.g AIX or IRIX. It is likely that both will > co-exist for some time. Agreed on that both will likely coexist for a long time. That argues for the subprefix (for one or the other) approach. Do think that's the right thing to do?
Attachment:
pgpKWNMPYRnAC.pgp
Description: PGP signature