apache24 Vs pkgsrc/meta-pkgs/web-server

[David Sainty <david.sainty%gmail.com@localhost>]

On 14/09/15 20:23, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 05:37:33PM +1200, David Sainty wrote:
> > On 13/09/15 04:52, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > Module Name:	pkgsrc
> > > Committed By:	joerg
> > > Date:		Sat Sep 12 16:52:09 UTC 2015
> > >
> > > Modified Files:
> > > 	pkgsrc/meta-pkgs/web-server: Makefile
> > >
> > > Log Message:
> > > Since Apache 2.4 is normally picked up anyway, just use it in first
> > > place. Bump version.
> > >
> > >
> > > To generate a diff of this commit:
> > > cvs rdiff -u -r1.23 -r1.24 pkgsrc/meta-pkgs/web-server/Makefile
> > This seems out of step with PKG_APACHE_DEFAULT in mk/apache.mk?
> >
> > apache.mk normally picks up apache22, currently.
> Well, that's not what you would get for binary packages at least.

If apache24 is the defacto standard for binary packages, and has been 
for a well-tested period of time, maybe it's time mk/apache.mk updated too.

Is that too rash for a freeze?

Could be a highlight for Q3 :)