Re: wrappers and gcc -isystem

[Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:22:46AM +0000, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
> Your patch only handles legacy wrappers, not cwrappers which is
> necessary for fast (bulk) builds.  If you can come up with a patch
> which handles cwrappers too (which would be required for integration
> anyway) then I'd be happy to test it.

As long as cwrappers is not enabled by default[1], I don't think this
should be a requirement for patches to be accepted.
 Thomas

[1] What's keeping this, anyway?