Re: Rewriting pkglint in a portable language

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 05:51:51PM +0200, Benny Siegert wrote:

> There is a clear policy for adding more architectures, see
> https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/PortingPolicy.

Very clear - what does "CLs" mean?

> Note that upstream also supports arm64, ppc64, ppc64le, mips64 and
> mips64le. But none of these are supported on NetBSD, IIRC.

aarch64 (what you call arm64) is work in progress, the others are suported
to some extend.

So does pkglint work with gccgo?

Martin