"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy%NetBSD.org@localhost> writes: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:27:41 -0400 > Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost> wrote: >> Yes, I can see that point. The other side of the coin -- which I >> think you are agreeing with -- is that the objection is a tortuous >> reading and that if the license authors intended to grant permission >> only when no copying fee was involved, they would have said something >> far clearer. Is that what you mean? > > Is it possible that the Pillow people meant to include "with" and it's > a simple copying error? Maybe we should ask them. I think you and Joerg are both suggesting that we ask Pillow to change their license text to be a normal license. It's fair to ask, but the history of pkgsrc engaging with upstreams to resolve things like this has been dismal. I almost suggested that originally, but refrained as it seems to be tilting at windmills.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature