tech-pkg archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Handling licenses
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 01:10:31PM +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
> Quoting http://www.netbsd.org/docs/pkgsrc/fixes.html#handling-licenses:
> > The pkgsrc system, as a policy choice, does not label packages
> > which have licenses that are Free or Open Source.
>
> This seems to contradict the current pkglint behavior, which says that
> ?Every package must define its LICENSE?. Since the text from the pkgsrc
> guide is 9 years old, is it still up-to-date?
Yes...? Every package is supposed to declare its license, and the
licenses we know about are in licenses/. The policy choice is that we
don't decide which of those are Free.
> Also, the pkgsrc guide does not give helpful instructions on determining
> which license a package has. Do we have some tool that I can feed a
> given COPYING file into, and it tells me which of the predefined
> licenses it is? Recognizing the GNU GPL is easy, since it says so, but
> choosing between the various BSD licenses requires reading the whole
> text, as far as I know.
If you can't tell or aren't sure, post and ask for opinions. If it has
its own thing, well, that's why licences/ has a lot of crap in it.
--
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index