tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Packaging krita, QT5/KDE problem

To: tech-pkg%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Packaging krita, QT5/KDE problem
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:48:21 +0200

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:18:00AM +0000, maya%netbsd.org@localhost wrote:
> Removing this hack fixes wip/krita. Why do we do it?
> It makes QT_VISIBILITY_AVAILABLE not defined after configure.

I'd leave the first part alone (dropping hard-coded optimizer settings).

Joerg

References:
- Packaging krita, QT5/KDE problem
  - From: maya
- Re: Packaging krita, QT5/KDE problem
  - From: Thomas Klausner
- Re: Packaging krita, QT5/KDE problem
  - From: maya
- Re: Packaging krita, QT5/KDE problem
  - From: maya
- Re: Packaging krita, QT5/KDE problem
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: Packaging krita, QT5/KDE problem
  - From: maya

Prev by Date: Re: Is statfs() still supposed to be in libc?
Next by Date: Re: Is statfs() still supposed to be in libc?
Previous by Thread: Re: Packaging krita, QT5/KDE problem
Next by Thread: Is statfs() still supposed to be in libc?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index