Re: New BLAS/LAPACK system

["Dr. Thomas Orgis" <thomas.orgis%uni-hamburg.de@localhost>]

Hi 

Also: can we import wip/cblas and wip/lapacke? At least the former now
comes up besides math/blas in my patched packages (e.g. numpy). The mix
of math/ and wip/ there seems so fragile that I'd really like to jump to

.include "../../math/cblas/buildlink3.mk"
.include "../../mk/blas.buildlink3.mk"

instead of

.include "../../wip/cblas/buildlink3.mk"
.include "../../mk/blas.buildlink3.mk"

Also, then, wip/lapack can be removed without breaking those two
packages. Alternatively, I could just modify wip/cblas and wip/lapacke to
use math/lapack/Makefile.common for the interim. What is preferred?
I think it is rather fragile to have the wip packages depend on very
recent changes in pkgsrc cvs.

The actual integration of the dependencies on math/cblas can come
later, of course.

The current users of wip/cblas are:

wip/plink
wip/plink2
wip/gemma

There are no current users of wip/lapacke.


Alrighty then,

Thomas

-- 
Dr. Thomas Orgis
HPC @ Universität Hamburg