Re: Adding mk/ssl.buildlink3.mk

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>]

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 09:46:14AM +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
> Would anyone object to me making a pass through the tree to replace
> 
> .include "../../security/openssl/buildlink3.mk"
> 
> with
> 
> .include "../../mk/ssl.buildlink3.mk"
> 
> and adding a simple mk/ssl.buildlink3.mk which just includes
> security/openssl/buildlink3.mk

I don't really see the point. We can pick a second version just as
easily from the existing security/openssl/b3.mk without all the churn.

Joerg