Re: merging cairo-gobject into cairo?

[Patrick Welche <prlw1%welche.eu@localhost>]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 01:52:48PM +0100, Benny Siegert wrote:
> > 2. If not, should we merge cairo-gobject into cairo? With SUPERSEDES
> >    support in pkgin it's not so annyoing as it was previously.
> 
> I am in favor of merging the two and following upstream.

Likewise.

In a similar vein, do we care about having parallel installable differing
versions of py-gobject3 / py-gobject32 with its py-gobject3-common?
(In some sense, it is an easier proposition to carry on given how
simple it is.)

Cheers,

Patrick