tech-pkg archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
On Sat, Jun 08, 2024 at 06:37:59AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Also, I think we as a larger community have reached the point where
> using gcc7 as a base compiler is no longer reasonable. It's probably
> only because of NetBSD's super-long release cycle (and LTS
> distributions) that we are even having this discussion. That to me
> argues for not weighting "want to use a compiler that is too old to be
> reliable" very much.
If you don't care about supporting too-old distributions then
why are you proposing changes to USE_CXX_FEATURES? That's its only
purpose.
- References:
- Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
- Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
- Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
- Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
- Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
- Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
- Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
- Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
- Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
- Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
- Prev by Date:
Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
- Next by Date:
Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
- Previous by Thread:
Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
- Next by Thread:
Re: gdal 3.9.0, C++17, charconv, gcc7
- Indexes:
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index