Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach

To: nia <nia%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
From: Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%mnx.io@localhost>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 09:07:25 +0100

* On 2024-07-14 at 23:51 BST, nia wrote:

any plans?

For many years I've wanted a slower-paced pkgsrc branch where onlytested changes get merged, and any regressions on any platform areconsidered fatal.

If enough people were interested in this then I'd be happy to helpco-ordinate and set up supporting infrastructure. In the past therejust wasn't any interest.


--
Jonathan Perkin   -   mnx.io   -   pkgsrc.smartos.org
Open Source Complete Cloud   www.tritondatacenter.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
  - From: Alistair Crooks
- Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
  - From: Rob Whitlock

References:
- "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
  - From: nia

Prev by Date: Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
Next by Date: bmake updated to 20240711
Previous by Thread: Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
Next by Thread: Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index