Re: Intentionally smaller pbulk builds

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Jörg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost> writes:

> On 12/26/24 1:04 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> This is a clue that our insistence on having the bulk build completely
>> fail if there are scan errors is not a reasonable strategy.   Packages
>> that can't find deps should just be marked failed (with some new token,
>> perhaps), and what can be done should be done.
>
> We've been there and you should be old enough to remember. The result
> was a lot of silent breakage that no one ever cared to clean up.

I remember that other people insisted on unreasonable choices, yes.