>> As an aside is the correct fix:
>> 		(signed char)tty->a_member_of_type_char == -1
> This is not a desirable fix, because it assumes that one has access
> to an ansi compiler.

Under what circumstances can this be untrue, seeing as how NetBSD ships
with a version of gcc?  It's a mildly old gcc, true, but not so old it
doesn't understand "signed char".

					der Mouse

			    mouse@collatz.mcrcim.mcgill.edu