Subject: Re: Considering port to new processor
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Mike Cheponis <mac@Wireless.Com>
List: tech-ports
Date: 03/31/2001 16:46:07
I have 4 MB in my PDP-11/70. Doesn't a minimal NetBSD run on 4 MB on i386?
Seems like it should be possible (in theory, at least) to do the port.
-Mike
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Jonathan Stone wrote:
> In message <5.0.0.25.2.20010330163107.02861ea0@208.226.86.10>,
> Chuck McManis writes:
>
> >At 07:27 PM 3/30/2001 -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> >>I don't think I was sufficiently clear. What I was getting at is that we
> >>no longer have the severely constrained address space of the PDP11, so it
> >>may be that we can do more with "bare minimum" hardware support.
> >
> >Except that there are those of us who would *like* to run NetBSD on a
> >PDP-11 system and this sort of stance leads to problems. [...]
>
> You *can't* run NetBSD on a PDP-11. Go look at 2.11BSD and why Steve
> Schultz stopped there. Not all of 4.4BSD would fit into 11 address
> spaces, let alone what NetBSD has grown into since. NFS? IPv6?
> mmap() and huge shared libraries with only eight 8k "pages"?
>
>
>
>