tech-repository archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: The essential problems of moving from CVS



On 2010-01-16 21:03 +0000 (Sat), David Holland wrote:

> The working copy, not the history. Scanning a whole tree takes a
> while. This is just filesystem I/O and not something git can do much
> about.

Just as a data point, on a fast machine (Core 8i) with a bog-standard
7200 RPM SATA disk, the initial scan is over a minute for me. (Warm
cache scan is under a second.)

I'm not clear if CVS is significantly faster than this or not. I'm
guessing not.

That said, I do think that git-subtree[1] deals with this appropriately.

[1]: http://github.com/bronson/git-subtree

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson         <cjs%cynic.net@localhost>         +81 90 7737 2974
             http://www.starling-software.com
The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism
by those who have not got it.    --George Bernard Shaw


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index