RE: CVS commit: pkgsrc/net/ocamlnet

[Tim Larson <tlarson%remitpro.com@localhost>]

> But it requires a great deal of git-fu.
[…]
> (It seems obvious to me that git is the only
> reasonable choice these days, but perhaps that's not the common view
> here.)

Personally I don't see anything wrong with svn.  Some think the distributed 
model is a huge benefit, but with a HA svn server and hot backup in a DR site, 
I don't see much practical difference. 

But then, I'm in the subset of devs that's been using cvs/svn forever, with not 
much git-fu.  I've tried to wrap my head around the mindset, but I just don't 
"get" git.

Tim
-- 
Tim Larson                                          402.933.0638?
Software Engineer                                  RemitPro, Inc.
The check isn't in the mail…                        402.861.0005?
               …it's already in the bank.           877.861.0005?