Re: NetBSD & Fossil

[Gour <gour%atmarama.net@localhost>]

Eric S. Raymond <esr%thyrsus.com@localhost> writes:

> Disclaimer: I'm not a netbsd dev, just the VCS domain expert that will be
> assisting with the conversion when it happens.

Do you use NetBSD? (Btw, I know about you and like your proposal to use
AsciiDoc(tor) for documentation.)

> I concur that Fossil is probably not suitable or a project of this size.
> Furthermore I suspect the designer of Fossil would say the same; there
> are hints of this in the Fossil documentation.

You’re right.

> However, I think the practical choices are git or hg.

But, at the moment it’s not something to be disccused?

Personally, I feel a bit strange to learn CVS in 2015 considering I was not
using when it was relevant VCS - I quickly jumped to Darcs and then was
using/trying {arch, bzr, hg, mtn, fossil, git} and now will probably try to
help EdgeBSD (NetBSD clone) which embraced git…


Sincerely,
Gour

-- 
Not by merely abstaining from work can one achieve freedom 
from reaction, nor by renunciation alone can one attain perfection.