Subject: Re: group for access to the password database
To: <>
From: Simon Burge <simonb@netbsd.org>
List: tech-security
Date: 07/13/2000 23:21:47
by mail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2000 13:22:48 -0000
via SMTP by mailo.vtcif.telstra.com.au, id smtpd0OC1Z_; Thu Jul 13 23:22:02 2000
via SMTP by localhost, id smtpdFJHGB_; Thu Jul 13 23:21:48 2000
by balrog.supp.cpr.itg.telecom.com.au (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
id XAA18865 for <tech-security@netbsd.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 23:21:47 +1000
Message-Id: <200007131321.XAA18865@balrog.supp.cpr.itg.telecom.com.au>
From: Simon Burge <simonb@netbsd.org>
Cc: tech-security@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: group for access to the password database
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2000 21:15:04 +1000 "
<12617.963486904@mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 23:21:47 +1000
Robert Elz wrote:
> Date: 11 Jul 2000 16:39:33 GMT
> From: tron@zhadum.de (Matthias Scheler)
> Message-ID: <8kfik5$4q1$1@colwyn.zhadum.de>
>
> | This might not be enough. "xlock" allows the removal of the screen lock
> | with the "root" password regardless which user is logged in.
>
> That feature is about the biggest "build me a trojan, please" that I think
> I've ever seen.
FWIW, we have an "xlock" account and use the password on that account
to unlock screens. While still not perfect, a tad safer than using the
root password...
Simon.