Jason, please do not make false statements like this.

4 messages directly on topic were not sent through until I asked for
them to be sent through.  Then they were sent through.  Was sending
them through a mistake, or was blocking them a mistake?  Can you
please clarify?

Hugh's messages in port-vax with booting bug fixes were also censored
and he had to replace his email address.

This is a message which was blocked until after:

    http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-security/2002/06/27/0016.html

Was this above message not relevant?

It was in response to this message:

    http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-security/2002/06/27/0008.html

Does this above message meet the requirements, where mine doesn't?

> On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 07:01:36PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> 
>  > Why are you bothering to have this witch-hunt conversation when our
>  > responses are censored?
> 
> If your responses would actually address the issues outlined, then the
> moderator of the list will certainly let them through.  However, it is
> precisely the fact that they consistently do NOT stay on-topic that
> they're not generally passed on.
> 
> -- 
>         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>