On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 07:45:37PM -0400, John Klos wrote:
> 
> Your concerns are unfounded - no extra support is needed. We're not
> talking about "more logic" which "has to be implemented". It works and it
> works now. I'd like to see that the code is correct in that it either
> reports the proper speed for each CPU or only reports the speed of one.
> 

IIRC Bill offered to put the patch in if it was clean, that sounds
reasonable to me.  The only caveat I would put on there is probably to
have the kernel print a warning that mixing cpu speeds is not well
tested and may cause system instability.

> 
> (BTW - what's up with all of those =20s?)
> 

Damn quoted printable mail client.

-- 
Brett Lymn