Subject: Re: MACHINE_ARCH vs. OBJ_ARCH
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@dsg.stanford.edu>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 07/26/1998 13:48:31
On Sun, 26 Jul 1998 13:45:49 -0700
Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
> If they do, it'll break all mips-related uses of ${MACHINE_ARCH} in
> Makefiles, walking into arch/mips/ sub-directories, set-list
> construction, tests for ${MACHINE_ARCH} in ONLY_FOR_ARCHES, and so on.
So, if a program is ONLY_FOR_ARCHES mipseb (because say we're running
an SGI binary, hey, it could happen), then my solution works and yours
doesn't.
> If those get broken I'm very tempted to back it out until they get
> fixed, so makefile or C-source clients can just test for "mips" or
> ``#ifdef __mips__'' again. It's just not as simple as Jason makes out.
Then you're being thick. Read what I said about the toolchain. Then think
hard.
Jason R. Thorpe thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center Home: +1 408 866 1912
NAS: M/S 258-5 Work: +1 650 604 0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: +1 650 940 5942