Subject: Re: Changes to bsd.lib.mk for some architectures
To: Simon Burge <simonb@netbsd.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 11/12/1999 09:59:01
On Sat, 13 Nov 1999 01:10:35 +1100
Simon Burge <simonb@netbsd.org> wrote:
> > I've done a "make build" with this on a pmax and have no problems so
> > far. It also seems from a limited look that the alpha can also use
> > this, but that ELF i386 and sparc can't. I'll do a full test on alpha
> > over the weekend.
>
> Mmm, I like alphas. They're faster than pmaxes :) It seems so far
> that the alpha is ok too.
>
> Note that there was on error in my patch - in bsd.own.mk, the default
> for MKPICLIB must be set before it is first tested...
I have one suggestion...
Instead of eliminating libfoo_pic.a, do the following:
libfoo_pic.a -> libfoo.a
that way 3rd party programs that might want PIC code don't have to care
about knowing if libfoo is inherently PIC or not :-)
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>