On Wed, 17 May 2000, David Brownlee wrote:

> On Tue, 16 May 2000, Ben Harris wrote:
> 
> > OK.  Given that SoftFloat is (mostly) machine-independent, what do people
> > think about a lib/libc/softfloat directory to hold the MI bits?
> > 
> 	Seems ot make a lot of sense - with 'arch/xxx' subdirectories as
> 	appropriate?

It'd seem more sensible to follow the rest of libc, and have
lib/libc/arch/${MACHINE_ARCH}/softfloat.

-- 
Ben Harris                                                   <bjh21@netbsd.org>
Portmaster, NetBSD/arm26               <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/arm26/>