Subject: re: our libstdc++.so.3 vs GCC 3.0
To: Todd Vierling <tv@wasabisystems.com>
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 08/02/2001 02:56:03
: so, i think we're screwed.
:
: GCC 3.0 defaults to building a shared libstdc++ on many platforms, and the
: version number of this shlib is 3. we unfortunately have called our
: egcs 1.1.2-based libstdc++ .so.3, so this conflicts... it's quite annoying,
: as programs linked against $gcc-prefix/lib/libstdc++.so runtime link with
: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3, unless explicit ld -rpath/LD_LIBRARY_PATH are used.
You mean gcc doesn't use the -release libtool option like all those other
braindead GNU projects do?
GCC doesn't use libtool or automake, only autoconf.