On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 06:19  AM, Ben Harris wrote:

> This suggests that if there's anything that's implemented in both libc 
> and
> libgcc then the only time the libc version will be used (in a static
> executable) is when it's used by libc and nothing in the application 
> has
> used it.  This seems really rather ugly to me.  Maybe I should try to
> understand how it works for dynamic executables, though I suspect that
> will make my head hurt.

I think we need to make sure that the libgcc never contains softfloat.  
The softfloat in our libc is better than libgcc's (for one, it supports 
the basic FP exception stuff).

I remember doing this for the SH target in GCC 3.x, but we should 
probably make a sweep through all of the GCC configurations.

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>