Subject: Re: /proc needed for 'gdb -p'? (was: CVS commit: src/gnu)
To: None <tech-toolchain@NetBSD.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 02/18/2006 08:07:11
On Feb 18, 2006, at 7:16 AM, Bernd Ernesti wrote:
> Does that mean you can't debug a process without having /proc?
> Hmm, reading the mail archives seem that this only affects users which
> don't supply the filename of that process.
FWIW, I am coming around to the idea that ptrace(2) should die a
horrible, horrible death and that /proc should be the blessed
interface for debuggers. It sure would make some things easier,
including thread debugging (think about the enumeration of LWPs).
-- thorpej