On Oct 30,  4:32pm, rearnsha@arm.com (Richard Earnshaw) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: structure alignment on arm in NetBSD? (resend without html)

| On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 16:18 +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > In article <1193678283.2124.3.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>,
| > Richard Earnshaw  <rearnsha@arm.com> wrote:
| 
| > >Nope, I do think I ever said that (the problem was that the EABI was
| > >still in development at the time we needed to freeze our ELF
| > >implementation).  In fact, I'd like to see NetBSD supporting the EABI
| > >now that it has stabilized.  We'll need to have some support in the
| > >kernel anyway in order to support more recent ARM/Linux binaries.
| > 
| > I am guessing that this is the reason I am getting SIGILL on linux
| > binaries, after the uname call.
| > 
| 
| It could be.  A sure way to tell would be to look at the version of
| ld-linux.so that is being required.  If it's ld-linux.so.2 then it's a
| non-eabi image.  If it's ld-linux.so.3 then it's the new EABI.

It is a static binary, but very recent.

christos