re: libgcc

[matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>]

   On Dec 5, 2009, at 12:07 PM, matthew green wrote:
   
   > i'd guess that you need to leave them in libc.so as a weak symbol
   > for all eternity, or at least until we bump libc.so.
   
   Would not be an issue if libc had a dependency recorded against the shared 
libgcc, yes?


i had that thought too.

i don't know what the ramafications of that are though.


.mrg.