tech-toolchain archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
> Folks who create their own binary distributions MUST also create their
> own binary patches if they so wish.
True. But it's better their own binary patches are bit identical to the
officially distributed ones. You can doubly make sure.
> There is no link between creation of binary patches and the various
> USE_*, MK*, or whatever, build options. Those options MUST stay static,
> unchanged, between the creation of the original binary distribution and
> the creation of any subsequent binary patches for that original
> distribution. They do not affect binary patches!
>
> Forget about them! They do not exist for all intents and purposes of
> creating binary patches!
For generation part yes. For patch users no. Better to keep some granularity
to minimize extent of impact.
Masao
--
Masao Uebayashi / Tombi Inc. / Tel: +81-90-9141-4635
- References:
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Prev by Date:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Next by Date:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Previous by Thread:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Next by Thread:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Indexes:
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index