tech-toolchain archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:59:47PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> I've already got *strong* objections against *removing* existing MK* / USE*
> vars (although I've never said I'd remove those).
However, I think there will be no objection against sanitizing existing
MK*/USE*.
There is a lot of misunderstanding going on, and at least I haven't yet
understood what you are trying to achive. Can you please try to explain
again from scratch?
Thanks,
Martin
- Prev by Date:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Next by Date:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Previous by Thread:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Next by Thread:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Indexes:
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index