Re: libelf

[Jason Thorpe <thorpej%shagadelic.org@localhost>]

On Dec 21, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:

> Most of the development of libelf happens in the sourceforge repository.
> Why have this changes not been done there? Why was the version from the
> FreeBSD subversion tree and not the central version imported?

Because I'm not interested in developing in a sourceforge repository.  We can 
always push changes back, of course.

>> Long term, there is some interest in getting away from BFD-based ar(1),
>> ranlib(1), etc.
> 
> Did you check the existance support in the repository above?

Yes.  It looked woefully incomplete.  Hence my comments about "long term".

-- thorpej