Re: config(5) break down

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:53:16AM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
 > > (FFS_EI isn't the only such option either, it's just one I happen to
 > > have already banged heads with.)
 > 
 > This one is easy, no need to make it difficult.

Sure, but as I said it was just an example; what about the next one?

 > Things like wapbl are currently an actual problem, since it is multiply
 > owned (conf/files *and* ufs/files.ufs).

I don't see why this is a problem either. The way things are right
now, vfs_wapbl.c is conditional on "wapbl" the same as the rest;
enforcing a hierarchical decomposition by source directory would break
this but that's part of why such hierarchical decompositions are a bad
idea.

(I've also never fully understood why wapbl has to have so many
tentacles hanging out of ffs, either.)

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost