tech-toolchain archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: g++/map vs. clang
In article <20120409221530.GN8483%danbala.tuwien.ac.at@localhost>,
Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>--- usr/include/g++/bits/stl_pair.h 2012-04-08 18:43:34.000000000 +0200
>+++ /home/wiz/stl_pair.h 2012-04-09 16:20:17.000000000 +0200
>@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@
> second(__p.second) { }
>
> #ifdef __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__
>+#if 0
> template<class _U1, class _U2>
> pair(pair<_U1, _U2>&& __p)
> : first(std::forward<_U1>(__p.first)),
>@@ -137,6 +138,7 @@
> second = std::move(__p.second);
> return *this;
> }
>+#endif
>
> void
> swap(pair& __p)
>
>-=-=-=-=-=-
I think it is better to ifndef __clang__ or whatever than #if 0 it.
christos
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index