Re: ansi.h include guards

[David Brownlee <abs%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On 9 February 2018 at 02:46, Christos Zoulas <christos%astron.com@localhost> wrote:

In article <CAGN_6pac__=60PqGK-pmvkiuUT-r4T6ObUzh0M8JU8oe32ZGGw@mail.gmail.com>,
David Brownlee  <abs%absd.org@localhost> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Surely all the per arch values should be consistently _MACHINE_ANSI_?

No, that does not work (see previous explanation):
i386 -> x86 -> sys

You can't have both i386 and x86 be _MACHINE.

Erk... Is there a sane _ANSI_   _MACHINE_ANSI_   _MACHINE_ARCH_ANSI_ pattern somewhere or is that trying to force it...

David