Re: LLDB/NetBSD report May/2018: Coverage of signal routines in the kernel in the context of ptrace(2)

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On Jun 1,  6:49pm, n54%gmx.com@localhost (Kamil Rytarowski) wrote:
-- Subject: LLDB/NetBSD report May/2018: Coverage of signal routines in the k

| The number of ATF ptrace(2) tests cases has been significantly
| incremented, however there is still a substantial amount of work to be
| done and a number of serious bugs to be resolved.
| 
| With fixes and addition of new test cases, as of today we are passing
| 1,206 (last month: 961) ptrace(2) tests and skipping 1 (out of 1,256
| total; last month: 1,018 total). No counted here tests that appeared
| outside the ptrace(2) context.
| 
| 
| Plan for the next milestone:
| 
| Cover with regression tests remaining elementary scenarios of handling
| crash signals. Fix known bugs in the NetBSD kernel.
| 
| Follow up the process with the remaining fork(2) and vfork(2) scenarios.
| 
| This work was sponsored by The NetBSD Foundation.
| 
| http://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/coverage_of_signal_routines_in
| 

Very nice!

christos